Reviewing Methods:


     The manuscript is sent togerther with the Cover Letter, completed in full and signed by all authors. For publication, each article is reviewed by the editorial team, checked whether the editing requirements were followed and if it is related to the topic of the review. In terms of the scientific content, each article (without the name of the author(s)) is sent to two reviewers for evaluation ( Step A ).

      The comments of reviewers will be sent to the author by the editorial board to make the necessary changes ( Step B ).

     Then, the checked article is sent back to the reviewers (Step C).

      If, at least one of the reviewers considers that the article does not fulfill the scientific terms of publication, the Editorial Board can refuse its publication.

      For the evaluation of an article (Step A), reviewers will take into account: importance of debated issues, adequacy of literature review, rigor of methodology used, rigor of analysis (appropriate interpretation), clarity of writing, explanations, and concepts, suitability of illustrations and tables (too many, too few, clarity), adequacy of abstract (accurate summary of entire paper) and keywords, adequacy of introduction (purpose and rationale), adequacy of conclusions, accuracy of the title and contribution to the study of tourism and geosites.